We cannot comprehend an infinite universe yet it must be the case as when taking the known universe into account ,it then becomes part not all ,and agreed that when we zoom IN and OUT there are points when detail is just undefinable, yet it is omnipresent ,and we exsist on a scaled level of it all , we can however decipher that there are two forces ,repelling on the lesser scale and gravity attraction on the larger scale ( heat , magnetism, gravity strong ,weik ),,0 being our perception level , as in the perfect model the supernova ,where upon matter collapsing into a less excited state overcomes repulsion ,boom big H bomb reaction. Try to think that there has to be space(linear nothing) betwixt matter ie, seperating it to allow for vibration spin and all its curvy wurvy groovings, then it is possible that a force is stopping the particles from seperating far apart ,gravity comes into the picture space to remain a continuim both seperating and encompassing matter in a {linear} kind of way ,as matter curves oscillates within & about it, hence the reason that a linear force provides means for matter to curve ,spiral, spin and for the living bits grow around and within.(what in nature is perfectly straight) The universal shape the sphere ,in cases such as large attracted clumps of the stuff ( moons, planets, stars ) density \mass attracts more matter until the (linear spaceflow,axial line and equatorial plains) is restricted so much as to force the particles into thermodynamic fusion in the case of a star ,, A model for this in our ambience is the spinning top , on a scale the spinning top has less mass ,than when the top is at rest, this of course is not taught in schools as it makes a mockery of the current quantum physics laws , so if the top does not loose mass when spinning , why does it weigh less? I reckon linear energy that is the axial linear and centrifugal force that spirals in a lateral linear plain from it,,,, food for thought? But does it taste good..